Jul 5, 2013, 3:15 PM EDT
The Formula One paddock was thrown into a state of panic on Friday night after the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) issued a statement claiming that its members would not hesitate to boycott the German Grand Prix if their safety was not guaranteed with the new Pirelli tires.
Following the fiasco that unravelled at the British Grand Prix last weekend, Pirelli acted swiftly to introduce its prototype tire for the race at the Nurburgring, with Paul Hembery explaining in the Friday press conference that over 1000 tires had been produced in just 48 hours. Although this was seeking to remedy the situation, the drivers unsurprisingly had reservations over the new tires, hence why the statement was issued by the GPDA.
Subsequently, the first free practice session began tentatively with all eyes on the Pirelli tires and the entire paddock willing for there not to be any further issues. Thankfully, there were no issues with the tires and all of the teams managed to complete their programmes as per usual.
After FP2, many of the drivers were asked about their thoughts on the new tires, with Sebastian Vettel and Charles Pic both feeling reassured over the changes made. Of course, (without wishing to tempt fate) a failure during FP3 or qualifying tomorrow could once again throw the race into doubt, but following a successful day for the teams and Pirelli, we should expect to see a thrilling grand prix on Sunday.
However, one interesting issue to come out of the boycott threat was those who did not conform with the GPDA. Three drivers who are not members of the association – Valtteri Bottas, Adrian Sutil and Kimi Raikkonen – could have ignored the boycott and continued to race regardless of their colleague’s actions.
Speaking to Autosport, Raikkonen said: “I was once involved in 2005 and funnily enough there were some guys that didn’t stop and they drove, so for sure I will race whatever happens this time.”
Raikkonen was referring to the 2005 United States Grand Prix at Indianapolis where all Michelin-shod cars withdrew after the French tire manufacturer could not ensure that there would not be tire failures. Marc Priestley was a mechanic for McLaren at the time, and he explained on Twitter how he was unsure whether Raikkonen would adhere to the boycott or not:
“When I strapped Kimi into the car that day in Indy, I genuinely had no idea if he’d stop or race, despite firm orders from Ron.”
The Finnish driver went on to lose out to Fernando Alonso in the drivers’ championship, with the race itself seeing just six cars on Bridgestone tires compete and Michael Schumacher lead home a Ferrari 1-2 ahead of Tiago Monteiro for Jordan.
The boycott may be looking less and less likely, but the repercussions could be felt for the rest of the season. The lack of unity and prioritizing of self-interest has helped to cause this situation, and a similar attitude from some of the drivers may not be appreciated by their colleagues.
- Gossage to Walker: “We needed a more competitive race this year than last year” 0
- Volkswagen Andretti pair of Foust, Speed seek better fortunes, consistency 0
- Hinchcliffe released from hospital, expected to make full recovery (VIDEO) 5
- Fast Facts: Chevrolet Indy Dual in Detroit 0
- Drivers ponder why cars didn’t go airborne during the Indianapolis 500 5
- Bell: “A wild Indy 500 without the finish we desired” 0
- Ryan: Juan Pablo Montoya comes full circle at Indianapolis 1