Dec 11, 2013, 5:43 PM EDT
Still searching for ways to improve the on-track product on intermediate ovals, NASCAR staged a second test session today at Charlotte Motor Speedway that featured a series of simulated races for different aero packages in addition to traditional single-car runs.
“One of the things that we learned and the reason we’re back here with so many cars is it is different when you have 30 cars or 25 cars out there versus the six,” NASCAR vice president of competition Robin Pemberton said this morning.
“It was important for us to come back here with a field of cars that we did. It gave us a little bit different view on some of the answers. It’s put us in some different directions.”
Five different sets of configurations were tested in the aforementioned races. Race 1, with Configuration 1, was “won” by Kevin Harvick by almost five seconds, with Harvick posting a best lap of 194.868 mph.
But Race 2, with Configuration 2, had Kyle Larson take P1 by a much smaller margin of .844 of a second and with a slower quick lap of 191.755 mph. In Race 3 (Configuration 3), Harvick was quickest again at 192.692 mph and beat Larson by 3.8 seconds.
The final two races saw things slow down further. Race 4 (Configuration 4) featured Larson returning to the top with a quick lap of 190.921 mph and the closest margin of victory (.219 of a second over Harvick). Finally, Harvick paced Race 5 (Configuration 5) at 189.907 mph, beating Larson by 4.5 seconds.
It’ll be a lot of data to sift through for NASCAR but its vice president of innovation and racing development, Gene Stefanyshyn, said multiple types of feedback, objective and subjective, would be taken into consideration in regards to the final 2014 aero packages.
“We have to take all that, triangulate it, try to find the alliance and what makes sense,” Stefanyshyn said. “It’s just a matter of looking at it all. If the data says this, there’s somebody that says something totally different, we scratch our head, see what other people said. You kind of balance it all.
“It’s not a perfect science, but we try to take all those inputs and utilize them in the triangulation to find the right answer. You will never get 100% agreement on everything. So really, you’re kind of looking for the 70% answer here that kind of leads you in the right direction.”
Video from NASCAR America
- NASCAR AMERICA: Jeff Gordon’s “Drive For Five” continues at Martinsville (VIDEO) 0
- NASCAR won’t penalize Ryan Newman, No. 31 team for Talladega infraction 0
- Total CEO dies in Moscow plane crash 1
- Insight: Planning Andretti’s Sports Marketing promotional efforts at Miami and NOLA 1
- Remembering racing legend Raymond Beadle: ‘Once upon a time, I was the best at what I did’ 2
- Weekend wrap: Brad Keselowski rises up to Talladega challenge 0
- The irony of a winless driver winning a title in the new Chase still exists 5