Mar 26, 2014, 9:30 AM EDT
The issue of regulatory language is in Red Bull’s belief that it didn’t commit a violation of Formula One’s new fuel flow regulations.
“Technical directives are not of regulatory value,” Red Bull team principal Christian Horner told Autosport. “They are the opinion of the technical delegate – as was made clear in the Pirelli case [the Mercedes secret test], which clearly stated that opinions of Charlie are not regulatory.”
Essentially, Red Bull is saying that technical directives issued from the FIA are not binding, and that if the car’s fuel flow rate was within F1’s technical regulations, it was legal.
The appeal hearing is set for April 14 in Paris; how the ruling comes down will go a long ways toward determining who holds the ultimate control of power and regulations in F1. If teams can run legally with their own fuel sensors, this could open the floodgates for teams to work against the sanctioning body.
As it is, it’s an early case of the off-track news getting more ink – or web space – than the on-track product.
Video from NASCAR America
- NASCAR schedule reveals some potential 2015 IndyCar schedule hints; Texas IndyCar returns 2
- Kevin Harvick riled at Tony Stewart portrayal in Kevin Ward Jr. tragedy 76
- Like a good stew, 2015 Sprint Cup schedule and new Chase format need time to simmer for best taste 1
- NASCAR AMERICA: How did the 2015 schedule come together? (VIDEO) 0
- NASCAR announces 2015 Sprint Cup, Nationwide, and Truck Series schedules (VIDEO) 4
- FIA won’t punish Nico Rosberg after Belgian GP incident with Lewis Hamilton 11
- Will Power once again in position for IndyCar title – but this time feels different 1