Skip to content

Ex-FIA president accepts ‘blame’ for F1’s new quieter sound

Apr 13, 2014, 8:45 AM EDT

Chief Executive Sly Bailey And Editors From The Trinity Mirror Group Give Evidence To The Leveson Inquiry Getty Images

Former FIA president Max Mosley has said that the critics of Formula 1’s new turbocharged V6 engines should blame him for instigating the reform, but he insists that it was the right decision to introduce the more efficient power units.

Mosley was president of the FIA between 1993 and 2009, and first investigated using the hybrid technology in the final few years of his tenure. These ideas carried over into the new presidency under Jean Todt, who finally implemented the changes for the 2014 season.

The new engines have split opinion largely because of their sound. In the wake of their screeching V8 predecessors, the V6 power units are certainly quieter, and for some this is a serious problem. The FIA has confirmed that it is investigating ways to make them louder, whilst Bernie Ecclestone and Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo have both been critics of the new formula.

In an interview with British newspaper The Daily Mail, Mosley confirmed that he was the first to talk about going hybrid.

“If anybody should be blamed it’s me,” he joked. “We were the ones who looked at bringing in the new technology. It was 10 years in the making, and I actually like the noise.

“I wear these things in both my ears [hearing aids] because the noise of the engines went right through me for 40 years or more. It’s too late to save my hearing but not for the next generation. The quieter engines are better for families. You can take children to races without fear of their being deafened.”

It is certainly easier to take children to a Formula 1 race, and also allows us to hear drivers locking up under braking and when making contact. Also, the engine sound is better in person than it is on television. The hybrid technology is widespread in other motorsport series, and brings Formula 1 closer to road car technology.

“It is important for Formula One to evolve,” Mosley said. “Safety was the big challenge of the 20th century and the environment is the big challenge of the 21st. If that that fact is not understood and embraced, the sport runs the risk of becoming irrelevant.”

As we saw in Bahrain, the sport is still capable of producing some scintillating racing despite being quieter. However, given that the sound is an important part of Formula 1’s image, it might be a problem that needs to be fixed in the near future.

  1. techmeister1 - Apr 13, 2014 at 2:39 PM

    IMO nothing needs to be “fixed”. The racing is good and the noise bearable. That’s a big plus over the ear piercing and dangerous sound levels that existed in F1 in the past.

  2. testover6370 - Apr 13, 2014 at 2:43 PM

    It is true that quieter engines make races more accessible to families. I took my nearly two year old to Indy qualifying at Long Beach yesterday and she loved it. The noise didn’t affect her. The Indycars sound racy though, where the F1 cars have sounded like garbage disposals with spoons stuck in them on TV. If it sounds better in person FOM should improve their world feed microphone setup.

  3. worknman24hours - Apr 13, 2014 at 9:21 PM

    F1 has to reflect the top technology not only of the day but of tomorrow also.

    All of the power systems used in the new F1 cars ,you can buy,(in extremely expensive super road cars ) today.

    Speed in all high performance cars is getting quieter and faster with much more torque way down low.

    Welcome to the future, today.

  4. thedude111 - Apr 15, 2014 at 5:41 PM

    This whole noise fiasco could have been avoided. They bolted a big muffler (the turbo) on the exhaust. I highly doubt Formula 1 engineers would have a hard time trying figure out how to make their cars crazy fast and efficient without a turbo. The turbo is the noise killer, not the hybrid technology.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!