Aug 1, 2014, 10:10 AM EDT
As we were looking at some of our favorite sites Friday morning, we came upon an interesting question posed by the guys over at Motor Racing Network (MRN.com):
“Is It Time For Timed Races?”
The guys from MRN.com suggested that NASCAR should consider shifting to timed events to, among other things, better integrate itself with TV time windows.
In other words, have a timed race run about 2 hours, 30 minutes, so that it can fit in a three-hour TV broadcast window.
Frankly, I’m not in favor of that at all. I like the system the way it is now, although I’d prefer to see some (not all) of the remaining 500-mile races on the schedule shifted to 400-mile events.
Plus, if we went to timed races, race strategy would take significant hits. We’d likely no longer see green-white-checker finishes, fuel mileage battles would likely cease to exist and, to me, timed racing would become boring.
Would you like to see timed races in NASCAR? Voice your opinion in the poll below.
Follow me @JerryBonkowski
- NHRA: ‘Fast Jack’ Beckman earns 5th Funny Car win of 2015; Brown (TF), McGaha (PS), Krawiec (PSM) also win 4
- After dream-fulfilling day, Graham Rahal isn’t worried anymore 0
- Graham Rahal now trails Montoya by nine points in IndyCar standings 3
- Karam’s Mid-Ohio spin triggers frustration, skepticism from IndyCar paddock 11
- Rahal scores dream win on home soil in Honda 200 at Mid-Ohio 4
- Helio Castroneves leads halfway through the Honda Indy 200 at Mid-Ohio 0
- What to watch for: IndyCar at Mid-Ohio (1:30 p.m. ET, CNBC and Live Extra) 0